Introduction

Winning TxDOT work isn’t just about guessing low. It’s about seeing where the money went, how many people showed up, and where no one bothered to compete. July’s data gives a simple map of that: who spent, who bid, and where the doors were left half open.

  • Unique Bidders — Fewer competitors mean better odds.

  • Total Spend — More dollars means more work to win.

  • Single-Bidder Jobs — The quiet corners where one bid gets the job done.

July in a Snapshot

July wasn’t the biggest month of the year, but it was broad and busy. TxDOT let $674.7M across 188 projects in 91 counties, drawing 861 total bids from 245 distinct firms, with 15 single-bidder awards (≈8% of jobs) where one contractor stood alone.

Where the Money Went

July’s dollars were concentrated but not narrow. A few counties carried a big share of the total, and two coastal counties alone accounted for almost 40% of all spend.

Top Counties by Total Spend (July 2025):

  • Kleberg — 1 project, 6 bidders, $178.4M

  • Galveston — 2 projects, 3 bidders, 3 unique bidders, $88.8M

  • Gregg — 1 project, 6 bidders, $31.9M

  • Webb — 3 projects, 8 bidders, 8 unique bidders, $29.2M

  • Harris — 8 projects, 38 bidders, 29 unique bidders, $23.5M

  • Robertson — 2 projects, 11 bidders, 8 unique bidders, $18.6M

Taken together, the top five counties by spend accounted for just over half of all July dollars. For contractors, that split the month into two worlds: a few big, crowded pots and a long tail of smaller jobs where the money was thinner but often less watched.

Where Bidders Had the Most Leverage

“Spend per bidder” is simply project dollars divided by the number of bidders. It tells you how much money each participant was effectively competing over.

Top 5 Counties by Spend per Bidder (July 2025):

  • Kleberg$178.4M over 6 bidders → $29.7M per bidder

  • Galveston$88.8M over 3 bidders → $29.6M per bidder

  • Gregg$31.9M over 6 bidders → $5.3M per bidder

  • Webb$29.2M over 8 bidders → $3.6M per bidder

  • Hood$14.6M over 4 bidders → $3.6M per bidder

Leverage was strongest where big jobs met short bidder lists. Kleberg and Galveston, in particular, gave each participant an unusually large slice of potential work, even though those jobs still drew multiple names.

Single-Bidder Jobs

Across July, 15 projects were awarded with just one bidder. El Paso led with 3 single-bidder awards, while twelve other counties — including Galveston, Webb, Nueces, Lubbock, Orange, Bexar, Grayson, Kaufman, Cass, Brown, Lamar, and Brazos — each had 1.

These are the quiet places in the data. When a job lets with only one proposal, it usually means either geography, timing, or scope kept competitors away. For contractors willing to look slightly off the main path, these counties show where bids can feel less like a fight and more like a conversation.

Competitiveness Rankings by County (July 2025)

Rank

County

Projects

Bidders

Unique Bidders

Single-Bidder Jobs

Spend

1

Galveston

2

3

3

1

$88.8M

2

Kleberg

1

6

6

0

$178.4M

3

Webb

3

8

8

1

$29.2M

4

El Paso

8

18

13

3

$17.7M

5

Gregg

1

6

6

0

$31.9M

6

Hood

1

4

4

0

$14.6M

7

Delta

1

2

2

0

$6.1M

8

Sabine

1

5

5

0

$14.7M

9

Wise

2

7

6

0

$15.9M

10

Nueces

2

8

8

1

$10.4M

11

Ward

1

7

7

0

$17.3M

12

Robertson

2

11

8

0

$18.6M

13

Montague

1

5

5

0

$10.4M

14

Lubbock

2

4

4

1

$3.6M

15

Gillespie

1

7

7

0

$9.2M

16

Orange

2

5

5

1

$3.0M

17

Bexar

7

31

22

1

$12.5M

18

Tyler

1

5

5

0

$5.6M

19

Erath

2

6

5

0

$5.2M

20

Grayson

4

18

17

1

$7.7M

21

Harris

8

38

29

0

$23.5M

22

Harrison

2

5

5

0

$4.0M

23

Wichita

1

3

3

0

$2.1M

24

Hill

1

3

3

0

$2.0M

25

Calhoun

1

7

7

0

$4.4M

26

Tarrant

8

41

28

0

$17.3M

27

Fort Bend

1

2

2

0

$1.1M

28

Kaufman

5

19

15

1

$4.0M

29

Chambers

1

2

2

0

$1.0M

30

Hopkins

1

4

4

0

$2.0M

31

Wharton

2

15

12

0

$5.8M

32

Dallas

7

31

20

0

$9.5M

33

Parker

3

14

13

0

$6.0M

34

Taylor

5

22

17

0

$7.8M

35

Hidalgo

3

13

12

0

$5.3M

36

Ellis

2

23

13

0

$5.7M

37

Fayette

1

10

10

0

$4.3M

38

Jefferson

4

21

20

0

$8.0M

39

Presidio

1

3

3

0

$1.2M

40

Cass

2

5

5

1

$959.4k

41

Denton

4

30

23

0

$8.7M

42

McLennan

2

6

6

0

$2.2M

43

Bell

1

4

4

0

$1.4M

44

Randall

1

2

2

0

$625.0k

45

Coryell

1

4

4

0

$1.2M

46

Brown

4

17

16

1

$2.4M

47

Motley

1

7

7

0

$1.8M

48

Ector

2

8

8

0

$1.9M

49

Llano

1

5

5

0

$1.2M

50

Guadalupe

2

9

9

0

$2.1M

Over the trailing year, TxDOT let $11.45B across 1,851 projects in 226 counties, with about 7,830 total bids from 517 participating firms and 147 single-bidder awards. It’s a big market, but the money and competition are not evenly spread.

Top 5 Counties by Total Spend

  • Travis — 39 projects, $2.2B

  • Dallas — 43 projects, $1.0B

  • Harris — 64 projects, $1.0B

  • Brazos — 29 projects, $698.6M

  • McLennan — 27 projects, $405.9M

Top 5 Counties by Unique Bidders

  • Collin — 43 projects, 94 unique bidders, 174 total bids

  • Denton — 43 projects, 94 unique bidders, 208 total bids

  • Harris — 64 projects, 90 unique bidders, 298 total bids

  • Bexar — 51 projects, 85 unique bidders, 228 total bids

  • Travis — 39 projects, 80 unique bidders, 182 total bids

Top Single-Bidder Hotspots

  • El Paso10 single-bidder awards

  • Nueces5 single-bidder awards

  • 11 Counties with 3 single-bidder awards - Collin, Jefferson, Dallas, Montgomery, Kaufman, Grayson, Webb, Brown, Bowie, Lamar, La Salle

12-Month Takeaway

Large metros like Travis, Dallas, Harris, Brazos, and McLennan still carry almost half of statewide spend, and they draw deep bidder pools. But the best margin often lives just outside those hubs — in places like El Paso, Nueces, Bowie, Montgomery, and Webb, where the dollars are meaningful and the field occasionally thins. A contractor who can work both worlds — metro volume and edge-of-market gaps — will see more options than someone who only chases the biggest headlines.

County Competitiveness: Last 12 Months (Aug 2024–July 2025)

Rank

County

Projects

Bidders

Unique Bidders

Single-Bidder Jobs

Spend

1

Travis

39

182

80

2

$2.2B

2

Dallas

43

169

67

3

$1.0B

3

El Paso

29

80

32

10

$161.5M

4

Dallam

1

1

1

1

$25.9M

5

Harris

64

298

90

2

$1.0B

6

Grayson

21

78

47

3

$285.3M

7

Brazos

29

106

62

1

$698.6M

8

Collin

43

174

94

3

$340.6M

9

Culberson

3

9

9

0

$127.6M

10

Nueces

25

86

50

5

$114.9M

11

Galveston

14

57

35

2

$150.9M

12

Kenedy

1

5

5

0

$61.6M

13

McLennan

27

132

74

1

$405.9M

14

Moore

5

13

12

2

$38.0M

15

Deaf Smith

2

5

5

0

$46.8M

16

Bexar

51

228

85

2

$262.6M

17

Madison

6

26

20

0

$184.5M

18

Webb

17

57

46

3

$103.6M

19

Denton

43

208

94

1

$405.3M

20

Montgomery

26

112

60

3

$127.5M

21

Kaufman

23

97

55

3

$115.9M

22

Kleberg

7

30

23

0

$181.2M

23

Sterling

1

3

3

0

$22.8M

24

Williamson

14

65

50

1

$166.6M

25

Cochran

1

5

5

0

$28.9M

26

Ochiltree

1

5

5

0

$28.8M

27

Rusk

4

10

9

1

$23.6M

28

Reeves

6

26

14

0

$70.1M

29

Hood

5

17

17

2

$28.2M

30

Hidalgo

24

96

57

0

$267.0M

31

Erath

8

33

25

2

$38.4M

32

Gregg

9

42

30

2

$45.8M

33

Hutchinson

3

10

9

1

$19.3M

34

Glasscock

1

2

2

0

$8.4M

35

Armstrong

1

5

5

0

$19.9M

36

Maverick

5

13

12

1

$22.6M

37

Menard

1

3

3

0

$11.3M

38

Lipscomb

1

5

5

0

$18.7M

39

Parmer

1

8

8

0

$29.7M

40

Tarrant

35

152

69

2

$84.7M

41

Robertson

7

37

17

0

$59.9M

42

Upton

1

4

4

0

$13.7M

43

Bowie

18

68

43

3

$36.7M

44

Crockett

2

11

9

0

$30.2M

45

Bastrop

10

61

49

1

$77.7M

46

Cass

8

27

20

2

$21.1M

47

Montague

5

22

12

0

$35.5M

48

Eastland

3

6

6

0

$17.8M

49

Cameron

8

28

21

1

$29.9M

50

Terrell

2

6

6

0

$17.1M

51

Brooks

2

5

5

1

$6.9M

52

Jefferson

35

140

77

3

$49.5M

53

Bosque

5

16

13

1

$16.6M

54

Nacogdoches

10

41

33

2

$27.0M

55

Goliad

6

18

14

0

$33.1M

56

Nolan

6

26

22

0

$51.1M

57

Lubbock

17

63

42

1

$48.4M

58

Franklin

4

14

14

2

$10.7M

59

Martin

1

5

5

0

$11.3M

60

Hill

11

45

30

1

$32.3M

61

Smith

21

114

66

1

$69.6M

62

Briscoe

1

4

4

0

$7.7M

63

Concho

2

8

8

0

$15.3M

64

Ector

23

87

51

2

$32.0M

65

Taylor

17

80

49

2

$30.2M

66

Hunt

15

72

54

2

$33.2M

67

Ward

2

10

10

0

$17.5M

68

Liberty

9

37

25

0

$42.6M

69

Sabine

7

25

20

1

$16.9M

70

Brazoria

14

64

32

1

$26.3M

71

Scurry

5

15

10

0

$16.4M

72

Lamb

6

20

17

0

$27.5M

73

Henderson

13

65

55

2

$29.4M

74

Hopkins

14

52

44

2

$23.4M

75

Matagorda

6

32

28

0

$43.2M

76

Hale

10

29

25

0

$38.3M

77

Grimes

6

33

23

0

$35.1M

78

Hudspeth

1

1

1

1

$752.7k

79

Parker

7

27

23

1

$17.2M

80

Lamar

18

65

40

3

$14.9M

81

Orange

12

47

39

2

$18.6M

82

Delta

7

22

20

2

$9.6M

83

La Salle

4

7

7

3

$2.5M

84

Baylor

5

22

16

1

$11.3M

85

Wichita

13

47

35

1

$24.2M

86

Jim Hogg

1

4

4

0

$5.5M

87

Jones

4

17

16

0

$22.0M

88

Wheeler

3

11

11

0

$14.9M

89

Gillespie

1

7

7

0

$9.2M

90

Brewster

6

14

13

1

$8.5M

91

Brown

13

60

46

3

$14.6M

92

Fannin

7

32

31

1

$19.7M

93

San Patricio

10

35

27

2

$11.4M

94

Howard

6

22

19

0

$23.7M

95

Frio

4

17

14

0

$17.2M

96

Duval

6

17

15

1

$8.6M

97

Austin

7

33

25

1

$14.1M

98

Angelina

18

87

51

0

$55.1M

99

Potter

14

60

43

0

$46.4M

100

Fayette

18

94

44

0

$47.1M

Acting on July’s Signals

  • Target high-value coastal work. Counties like Kleberg and Galveston showed that one or two projects can move the whole month. If you can handle coastal scopes, these spikes are worth tracking closely.

  • Use spend-per-bidder as a filter. July’s best leverage came where big dollars met short bidder lists. Watch counties where each bidder is effectively competing for $3M–$30M of work instead of a few hundred thousand.

  • Don’t ignore mid-sized counties. Places like Gregg, Webb, Hood, and Robertson won’t make the top-line headlines, but they quietly stacked millions in work with manageable competition.

  • Study single-bidder pockets. El Paso and the scattered one-off single-bidder counties show where geography, timing, or perceived difficulty kept others away. That’s usually where relationships and preparation pay off most.

  • Cross-check July against the 12-month map. Use the rolling-year view to see whether July’s signals in counties like Webb or Nueces are one-off blips or part of a longer trend.

In the end, opportunity is just the overlap between where money flows and where others don’t show up in force. Bidlo’s job is to make that overlap visible, month by month, county by county, so you can decide where to lean in, where to test the edges, and where to quietly become the default bidder.

If you’d like to get next month’s analysis straight to your inbox, sign up here.

Keep Reading

No posts found